<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film bigots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unsolicitedopinion.net/2009/07/15/film-bigots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unsolicitedopinion.net/2009/07/15/film-bigots/</link>
	<description>on software development, design, photography, apple, iphone, journalism and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:43:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Film bigots II &#60; unsolicitedopinion</title>
		<link>http://www.unsolicitedopinion.net/2009/07/15/film-bigots/comment-page-1/#comment-5807</link>
		<dc:creator>Film bigots II &#60; unsolicitedopinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsolicitedopinion.net/?p=282#comment-5807</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] unsolicitedopinion on photography, journalism, apple, iphone and life     &lt; Film bigots [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unsolicitedopinion on photography, journalism, apple, iphone and life     &lt; Film bigots [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: film bigots</title>
		<link>http://www.unsolicitedopinion.net/2009/07/15/film-bigots/comment-page-1/#comment-5803</link>
		<dc:creator>film bigots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unsolicitedopinion.net/?p=282#comment-5803</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but you missed the point.  Or a lot of points, I should say.  If you read past the &#039;about&#039; page, you&#039;d see what you&#039;d missed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For instance, it&#039;s not against post processing per se. It&#039;s about EXCESSIVE postprocessing that takes the &#039;photography&#039; out of, well, photography.  It&#039;s about using things like extreme HDR or making people have skins like bronzed rubber vinyl.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;1 hour lab processing&quot;? If you looked at the tags, you&#039;d note that a good number indicate some form of developing reference. In BW.  Since when did 1 hour labs run D76 or Rodinal? Would you have that where you are?    Many of the photos posted there also originate from prints - some conventional bromides, some alternative prints. And of the scans, many were subjected to some form of post processing- just enough to make them look right, and restore what the machine missed.  The machines and software used often don&#039;t render things as how the photographer saw the image.  Just enough to put back what was lost.  Not as far as making neon sunsets or plastic skins.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But then again, you probably did not see all these, did you?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but you missed the point.  Or a lot of points, I should say.  If you read past the &#8216;about&#8217; page, you&#8217;d see what you&#8217;d missed.</p>

<p>For instance, it&#8217;s not against post processing per se. It&#8217;s about EXCESSIVE postprocessing that takes the &#8216;photography&#8217; out of, well, photography.  It&#8217;s about using things like extreme HDR or making people have skins like bronzed rubber vinyl.</p>

<p>&#8220;1 hour lab processing&#8221;? If you looked at the tags, you&#8217;d note that a good number indicate some form of developing reference. In BW.  Since when did 1 hour labs run D76 or Rodinal? Would you have that where you are?    Many of the photos posted there also originate from prints &#8211; some conventional bromides, some alternative prints. And of the scans, many were subjected to some form of post processing- just enough to make them look right, and restore what the machine missed.  The machines and software used often don&#8217;t render things as how the photographer saw the image.  Just enough to put back what was lost.  Not as far as making neon sunsets or plastic skins.</p>

<p>But then again, you probably did not see all these, did you?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

